Search for: "State v. Contreras" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
Contreras, 15-58, which asked whether a police officer who used deadly force to prevent a suspect’s escape was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Contreras 15-58Issue: (1) Whether the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness standard requires that a suspect threaten a police officer with a weapon before the police officer can use deadly force to apprehend the suspect, or whether Tennessee v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm rulingFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFormer Secretary of Homeland Security, former FTC chairman, and conservative think tank dismiss Qualcomm's and DOJ's "national security" argumentsFour IT industry bodies support FTC against Qualcomm's appeal: once again, The Industry v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 2:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  As the balance of federal and state regulatory authority shifts, at what point is the “tradition” is upended? [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Brad Biddle, Arizona State University College of Law (with Jorge Contreras & Vigdis Bronder) Certification (and) Marks – Understanding Usage and Practices Among Standards Organizations Some mismatch in definition of “certification” marks—some organizations deliberately avoid that term. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At Understanding the ADA, William Goren notes that the court’s opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
Contreras Presidential Scholar and Professor of Law S.J. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:38 pm by Dennis Crouch
Eileen Kane (Penn State) offers a clue in the distinction as between genetics and chemistry. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
President Nixon was forced to turn over the Watergate tapes to the special prosecutor (U.S. v. [read post]