Search for: "State v. Conyers" Results 81 - 100 of 100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2009, 2:25 am
In a states' rights oriented decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:30 pm
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 11:48 am
Supporters note the momentum they gained March 4 when the Supreme Court, in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)   US General – Decisions California state appeals court upholds Bank of America win in trade secret spat with K C Multimedia (Law360)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Canon USA – Canon sues former employee for revealing trade secrets to rival Ikon Office Solutions in violation of confidentiality agreement (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent Reform Act of 2009 introduced in Senate and House… [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 10:00 pm
" (source: Congressional Daily) District Court Clarifies How PTO Should Compute Patent Terms Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
It was also a victory for the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
Phone: (404) 881-0292 Fax: (404) 881-6997 E-mail: gaaarp@aarp.org Web: http://www.aarp.orgga ADA Regional ADA & IT Technical Assistance Center Southeast Disability and Business Technical Assistance Center Center for Assistive Technology and Environmental Access Georgia Tech, 490 10th Street Atlanta, GA 30318 Phone: (404) 385-0636; (800) 949-4232 (V/TTY/Toll Free) E-mail: sedbtac@catea.org Web: http://www.sedbtac.org Georgia ADA Exchange 4164 Admiral Drive Chamblee, GA 30341… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court granted a Writ of Certiorari on March 26, 2007 in the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 6:36 am
This week, Representative John Conyers introduced a resolution recognizing the 50th anniversary of the 1957 enforcement of Brown v. the Board of Education in Little Rock, Arkansas. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
In the brief, the members note that, if the Supreme Court decides against investors in this case, third parties will effectively be immune from suit no matter how reprehensible their conduct.In the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:33 pm
Saxbe Designated Professor of Law, Moritz College of Law, The Ohio State University Tom Cochran, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Middle District of North Carolina (Attorney for [sic] Vincent Rita, Rita v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Supp. 51 (D.D.C. 1973) (holding that the $10,000 jurisdictional amount in controversy requirement then in the statute (it's since been eliminated) was not satisfied); United States v. [read post]