Search for: "State v. Cookson"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2014, 4:33 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court decided Jeffrey Cookson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:10 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Cookson readily agreed that amending the compact would be beyond the power of the special master, citing Alabama v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
South Africa is the first Member State that has adopted a customised version of the WIPO manual on this topic. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 11:14 am
Cookson v Assethold Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES) (2020) UKUT 115 (LC) An appeal on section 20B Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 8:32 pm
By Cara CooksonState v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
In Cookson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm
In Cookson v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
The temporary ban was imposed after a chaplain was accused of smuggling in contraband in prayer oil.In Cookson v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
Cantor on whether all US patent issues, including claims under State law, should be heard by the Federal Court. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 3:29 pm
Finally, on the SOLO IP blog, Barbara Cookson trials the new Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys website. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 11:17 am
Cookson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
Meanwhile. over on SOLO IP, Barbara Cookson was writing about that issue which, many folk hoped, had all been resolved: the extent to which injunctions to stop patent infringement are just optional or pretty well mandatory. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
On SOLO IP, Barbara Cookson reflects on another fun notion -- the contrast (or is it contradiction?) [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This is because the two opposing experts are going have to testify about the state of knowledge of the person skilled in the art with regard to Baldwin's Rules for ring closure. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
As the feature explains: "A closely watched trial in federal court in Atlanta, Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:49 am
In Haiss v Ball, the offers to settle were Civil Procedure Rules (CPR), Part 36 offers. [read post]
