Search for: "State v. Country" Results 301 - 320 of 26,407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:24 am by sally
AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395; [2012] WLR (D) 106 “In looking to the question whether an asylum seeker, who had been a member of a terrorist organisation and convicted of a crime outside the country of refuge, fell to be excluded from the Refugee Convention pursuant to article 1F(b) and (c) thereof, one had to avoid applying a presumption of individual liability; and in asking whether the crime in question was… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:28 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The legislation is one of the most extreme anti-immigrant laws ever passed by any state legislature in the country. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
United States, the court analogizes this case to Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
United States Citizenship & Immigration Services. 407 F.Supp.3d 311 (D.D.C. 2019); Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:22 am
Recently, South Carolina joined the ranks of states standing up to insurers on this issue, with the state supreme court ruling in Williams v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 8:32 am by Reproductive Rights
Planned Parenthood Is Not Nothing, by Scott Lemieux: The recent spate of anti-abortion regulations in states across the country has made me pessimistic about the future of reproductive rights, but Irin Carmon... [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Monte Mills
In 1823, Chief Justice John Marshall concluded in Johnson v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
Particular regard was given to the case of Soering v United Kingdom (1989) 11 EHRR 439, where it was held that allowing an extradition of a party to the United States would constitute a violation of that person’s Article 3 rights, as he would be exposed to the risk of the application of the death penalty as a direct consequence of the extradition. [read post]