Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 41 - 60
of 23,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2008, 8:58 am
Regina (Davies) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Queen’s Bench Division “There was a need to introduce a requirement that claimants who wished to make a challenge under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should have to obtain the court's permission to do so. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:37 am
Batista v Secretary of State of the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 896; [2010] WLR (D) 233 “When considering whether a decision to deport a national of the European Economic Area (‘EEA’) was proportionate, the court should ask itself whether members of the deportee’s family would move to the country of origin with the deportee and whether it was reasonable to expect them to do so, rather than to ask whether there were ‘insurmountable… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:09 pm
The grant is limited to question 1 — here are the questions presented: Whether a State has authority to prosecute non- Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.Whether McGirt v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 7:39 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm
In Montana v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:10 am
Here is the unpublished opinion in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:36 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 2:38 pm
DUI REDUCED to Reckless Driving – State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:12 am
The abstract: In the seminal Indian water rights case, Winters v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:21 am
Cascade Yarns, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:01 am
Regina (RK) (Nepal) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A non-British student with conditional leave to enter and stay in the United Kingdom and who was ordered to leave on breaching those conditions, could not appeal against that decision while still in the country. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 4:32 pm
The Washington Post - Wonkblog: All states except Oregon now limit abortion access, by Sarah Kliff: Roe v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:25 am
Regina (Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Court of Appeal “Proposals to replace two-tier local government in some parts of the country with unitary authorities, made before the necessary statutory powers were in place, were lawful as long as genuine reconsideration had been given to them after the commencement of the relevant Act. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
R (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 464; [2008] WLR (D) 150 “The scope of the deeming provision in Sch 3, Pt 2, para 3(2) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc) Act 2004, which required states listed in Sch 2, Pt 2, para 2 of the Act to be treated as countries safe for a person to be returned, was limited to the actual process of executive decision or adjudication of whether a person's removal… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
Regina (YZ (China)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 1022; [2012] WLR (D) 237 “Where a foreign national was removed from the United Kingdom in consequence of the unlawful issue of a certificate under section 96(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 following refusal by the Secretary of State of his application for revocation of a deportation order, there was no presumption that the court should order his return to pursue… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:50 pm
Abortion policy is now in the hands of the states following the US Supreme Court’s Friday decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 1:30 pm
Bell Supply Co, LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:07 am
Here are the materials in Roth v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:07 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees intervening); SM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); AM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening); KM (Zimbabwe) v Same (Same intervening) [2012] UKSC 38; [2012] WLR (D) 226 “A claim for asylum should not be defeated on the ground that an individual who had no political views, and who therefore did not support the persecutory regime in his home… [read post]
