Search for: "State v. Country" Results 161 - 180 of 22,927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2010, 2:31 am by traceydennis
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Court of Appeal “An English Court had no jurisdiction to enforce a United States court judgment since there was no treaty between the two countries for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments; the appropriate way was to bring an action on the judgment in England to enforce it. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
While in the Voting Section, she received the high honor of being invited by the United States Solicitor General to sit at counsel table during the Supreme Court argument in Reno v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am by Sean O'Beirne, Kingsley Napley LLP
On 23 November 2015 the Supreme Court heard a two day appeal of the decision in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 1608. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Hillary M. Hoffmann
The Supreme Court first examined the constitutionality of a delegation of authority from Congress to a Tribe in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm by Berry Law Firm
It stated that since the country’s law apply to those 12 nautical miles, so should the statutory language. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm by Margaret Stock - Guest
  In striking down a state system of alien registration, the Court in Hines v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:30 am by sally
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456; [2011] WLR (D) 147“There was no general rule to the effect that any returned asylum seeker who would be in a position to avoid risk of persecution only by falsely claiming to support the regime in his home country would be entitled to asylum; rather, it was necessary to make a close examination of the particular circumstances of the individual, as each case would turn on its own facts. [read post]