Search for: "State v. Covington" Results 1 - 20 of 335
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0426, 2012 MT 31, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:30 am by Daily Record Staff
Appellant Timothy Aaron Covington was charged with four counts, including: resisting arrest in violation of Md. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
Earlier this week, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint against one of the country's leading law firms - Covington & Burling LLP. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:20 am
Today’s Legal Times updates readers on developments in Young v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  (Plaintiff has not "shown that the Covington Report is essential to his stated purpose, which is to investigate possible corporate wrongdoing. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Patrick Vance have posted The Scope and Implications of Stern v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:14 am by Steve Satterfield
  This Covington E-Alert provides a detailed look at the parties' arguments and the court's holdings in order to assess what the decision means for businesses going forward. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
The case involved statements made to police by Anthony Covington identifying Richard Bryant as his assailant and stating the location of the shooting as he lay dying in a gas station parking... [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although these proposals have been around for some time, recent contentious election cycles, debate over hot-button issues, including the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:12 am by Bexis
  As we mentioned previously, that issue is currently pending in the Alabama Supreme Court in Wyeth v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 5:09 am by Russ Bensing
  Yesterday, the US Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the Michigan Supreme Court was right in holding that Covington’s statements were inadmissible because they were testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]