Search for: "State v. Craig" Results 101 - 120 of 1,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 25th November, the Court will hear the case of Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, at 10:30 in Courtroom One. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:54 am by Leila Rafei
The agent, Craig Monteilh, professed his conversion before hundreds of congregants during the month of Ramadan. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
The Defendants in Craig McLachlan’s defamation case have alleged that the actor touched a colleague’s breast during a rehearsal for Neighbours in the 1980s during a preliminary hearing. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:18 am
Corporate Liquidity Provision and Share Repurchase Programs Posted by Craig M. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm by Clayton Perkins
Skepnek, of The Sader Law Firm, of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kevin Babbit, of Fagan & Emert, LLC, of Lawrence, Kansas won in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Craig Xu examined the News Media Bargaining Code one year after it was introduced by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission for Inforrm here. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
In June, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:25 pm by Unreported Opinions
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Other crimes Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Craig Russell Williams, appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, robbery with a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit robbery with a deadly weapon, and use of a handgun in the ... [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
A key element of the tariff question is the meaning of Section 68.2(1) of the Copyright Act which states: 68.2 (1) Without prejudice to any other remedies available to it, a collective society may, for the period specified in its approved tariff, collect the royalties specified in the tariff and, in default of their payment, recover them in a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 17 – Copyright Substantial Similarity Crossprogrammed with my panel; I came here first because I had more experience with the first paper in the other panel. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 6:28 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the unanimous court made it clear it disagreed with the analysis, stating “there are some significant jurisprudential problems with those aspects of their judgments that warrant comment. [read post]