Search for: "State v. Crane" Results 41 - 60 of 540
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 5:36 am by Joel R. Brandes
[New Zealand] [Necessary expenses] [Clearly inappropriate]          In Crane v Merriman, 2018 WL 4291755 (W.D. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:45 am
A “general release” of liability for an injury is not sufficient to insulate a governmental agency from liability resulting from its own negligenceRigney v Ichabod Crane Cent. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
A “general release” of liability for an injury is not sufficient to insulate a governmental agency from liability resulting from its own negligenceRigney v Ichabod Crane Cent. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A "general release" of liability for an injury is not sufficient to insulate a governmental agency from liability resulting from its own negligenceRigney v Ichabod Crane Cent. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Automated Merchandising v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:43 am
The United States later initiated this criminal prosecution. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Jon Robinson
  The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dispatched this argument by citing Neal v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:06 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent case of Ahmed v Aventis Pharma Ltd [2009] EWHC 9052 (Costs) dealt with two small issues but both ones of interest.Firstly, following the decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Ltd [2007 EWCA Civ 1352, where solicitors outsourced the job of sorting and summarising medical records they could treat this work as forming part of their profit costs rather than being treated as a disbursement, and thereby make a profit on this work.The second issue considered whether… [read post]