Search for: "State v. Crosby" Results 141 - 160 of 222
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
But, while the word ‘shall' is often mandatory, particularly when used in legislation, it has, depending on the context, been interpreted on occasion as directory or exhortatory only: see for example R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Jeyeanthan [2000] 1 WLR 354. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:31 pm
Second, the child's mother can also file a complaint with the state department of health stating all of the facts. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 6:36 pm
Although the laws appear to be modeled after similar divestment laws directed at apartheid-era South Africa, they also appear to fly in the face of Crosby v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:40 pm
id=13796&deptid=5 (stating that the PTO announced a 54% allowance rate). n19. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:05 am
Unfortunately not.The Court of Appeal's decision in Crosbie v Munroe [2003] EWCA Civ 350 makes it clear that a Part 47.19 offer does not include the costs of the detailed assessment proceedings (ie the work relating to negotiations and assessment of the costs of the substantive claim). [read post]