Search for: "State v. Cruz" Results 101 - 120 of 853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Wednesday’s ruling, the US Supreme Court determined that Arizona incorrectly disallowed Cruz’s request because the federal Simmons decision overruled binding state court precedent, effectively altering the ability for capital defendants to inform the jury of their ineligibility for parole. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Ct. 1201 (2012)), which seemingly puts state-created unconscionability doctrine outside the ambit of FAA preemption, before the proceedings focused on Cruz and Broughton. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:22 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
If Ted Cruz or Josh Hawley run instead, people will also challenge their eligibility under Section Three. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 5:30 am by Peter Charles
This case also demonstrates a common issue in law – not everything is black and white; there is a lot of gray area. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:00 am by autumn
The Florida 2nd DCA has recently decided the case of Barrios-Cruz v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
Bagley on Tuesday, May 22, and United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:38 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Bush sided with the ICJ, the State of Texas, under Solicitor General Ted Cruz, argued against the president. [read post]