Search for: "State v. Cunningham"
Results 1 - 20
of 548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Cunningham noted a timely appeal ... [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Criminal law — Sufficiency of evidence — Firearm convictions Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Gary Jay Cunningham, Jr., appellant, was convicted of possession of a regulated firearm by a disqualified person; wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun in a vehicle; wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun on his ... [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 5:40 pm
Earlier today, the state Supreme Court took a closer look at 265 cases to see whether they were affected by Cunningham v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
If you don't know about Cunningham v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:16 pm
Cunningham v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:25 pm
Cunningham (Georgia State University College of Law) & Ute Römer-Barron (Georgia State University) has posted Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024) on SSRN. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:12 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority in Cunningham v. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:32 am
Feb 26, 2007) (available for download below): The sky is not completely falling in California after Cunningham v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Cunningham provides a big boost in two areas of current and future Ninth Circuit rehearings en banc.In Cunningham, the Court addressed the California state sentencing system, which permits a sentence at the high end of a guideline based upon certain findings. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:40 am
State, to fit within the category of an illegal sentence, the illegality must inhere in the sentence itself, i.e., there either has been no convinction warranting any sentence or the sentence is not a permitted one for the conviction upon which it was imposed and, for either reason, is intrinsically and substantially unlawful. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
State and Littrell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0496, 2011 MT 88, TIM FELLOWS, SCOTT CUNNINGHAM, JAMES DAY, BETH DORAN, et al., Petitioners and Appellants, v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:05 pm
We covered earlier AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 8:55 pm
Cunningham (Georgia State University College of Law) has posted "Abortion" in the Founding Era: A Reply to Methodological Critiques of Miller & Bacallao, Justice Alito's Question (Georgia State University College of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:48 am
Guest blogger: Norah Cunningham, law student, University of San Francisco “Hands-on-the-Hips” Arguments: Replacing Legal Reasoning with an Underlying Rhetoric of Fear and Criminalization In my Legal Research, Writing and Analysis class, my professor cautioned my class of fresh-faced 1Ls against... [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
By Abby Brothers Cunningham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
The case of Fischer v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Matter of Matter of Cunningham v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2011 NY Slip Op 08529, Appellate Division, Third Department Michael A. [read post]
