Search for: "State v. Cunningham" Results 21 - 40 of 571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Matter of Matter of Cunningham v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2011 NY Slip Op 08529, Appellate Division, Third Department Michael A. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:05 am by AdminLaw Blogger
From the New York Law Journal, "Panel Backs Use of GPS Device on State Worker's Personal Car" by John Caher, reviewing Cunningham v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Eugene Volokh at The Volokh Conspiracy comments on the Eleventh Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Under Teague, the state argued what is old is really new, especially when it comes to Cunningham. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:33 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Cunningham, Lawrence A., Congressional Testimony: Problems with the SEC's Climate Disclosure Proposal (January 18, 2024). [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:22 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Henry Cunningham v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:25 am
Evidence obtained using a global positioning device [GPS] permitted in administrative disciplinary hearingMatter of Matter of Cunningham v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2011 NY Slip Op 08529, Appellate Division, Third Department Michael A. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 6:02 am
Reporting on the July 31st COA decision in Joshua Cunningham v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 4:28 pm by Art Hinshaw
  You can find his thorough analysis on the issues and arguments in AT&T v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
On the other hand, I’ve seen other appellate opinions do the same thing (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Ezra Rosser
New Article: Keith Cunningham-Parmeter, Forced Federalism: States as Laboratories of Immigration Reform, 62 Hastings L.J. 1673 (2011). [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
  It starts with this notable sentence: "The California sentencing law that the Court strikes down today is indistinguishable in any constitutionally significant respect from the advisory Guidelines scheme that the Court approved in United States v. [read post]