Search for: "State v. Daniels" Results 61 - 80 of 5,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2018, 12:42 pm
  So Daniels Sharpsmart gets a ton -- actually, 320,000 pounds -- of California-created medical waste, and instead of burning it, ships it to Kentucky and Indiana, which (perhaps not surprisingly) allow medical waste to be dealt with in a much more lenient matter.California tries to stop this scheme, but Daniels Sharpsmart sues, saying that California's attempt to regulate medical waste generated in California violates the Constitution; in particular, the dormant Commerce… [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 8:26 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Juror misconduct — Motion for mistrial Two groups of men engaged in a shootout on November 20, 2012, on Greenmount Avenue in Baltimore City causing the death of Daniel Pearson and serious injury to Dajuan Clinkscale and James Woodfalk. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Hannah R. Albion
Whether you operate a large e-commerce company on Amazon, a specialized artisan store on Shopify or Etsy, or a local t-shirt company, all brands producing products resembling famous marks should consider the implications of the seminal Supreme Court ruling in Jack Daniels v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am by JA Hodnicki
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:45 am by by PritzkerLaw
The firm represents Salmonella infection victims throughout the United States, and has recently filed a lawsuit in Nevada (Shirley Shultz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareAs expected, Wednesday’s argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products showcased the justices grappling with line-drawing. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 2:50 pm by JB
If Trump's case is analogous to New York Times v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by Beatriz Beserra
On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 9:15 am by Beatriz Beserra
On June 8, the United States Supreme Court handed down a surprisingly decisive ruling on trademark law and its relationship with First Amendment rights. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 3:22 pm by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel on the Supreme Court’s certiorari grant in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Paul Caron
IRS and the Future of Tax Administrative Law (Part II), by Daniel Hemel (Chicago): In Bullock v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:30 pm
Daniel Sokol Michael Harker of the Univeristy of East Anglia - Norwich Law School writes on Cross-Border Mergers in the EU: The Commission v. the Member States in the most recent issue of the European Competition Journal.... [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am by Ronald Mann
ShareIt is fair to expect Wednesday’s arguments in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:06 am by Eric Goldman
VIP therefore was entitled to judgment in its favor on the federal and state law dilution claims. [read post]