Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 181 - 200
of 6,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Davis was asked about the guidance again by Congressman Barry Moore (AL-R), to which Davis stated: The Attorney General’s guidance was clear, indeed crystal clear, to protect the lives of the justices and make sure that we still had full authority to make arrests, but not to engage in any activity that would compromise their [the justices] safety. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
Finally, as the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:24 pm
Davis, 737 So. 2d 1170, 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (quoting Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
Moving to another state clearly does require some kind of action with the court. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
