Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 241 - 260 of 5,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2021, 5:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Magnant: Mich SCT Opinion Davis Brief Magnant Brief State Brief Magnant Reply Davis Reply Prior post here. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:55 am by INFORRM
United States of America v Tuggle – did establishing three CCTV cameras, encircling a man’s house for 18 months violate his privacy rights per the Fourth Amendment? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:56 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
But Nugee LJ, persuaded by Ocado’s counsel, stated in obiter that the interference with a foreign court here was of a lesser extent. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The victim in this Davie County murder case was a “neighborhood runner,” running errands for people in general, and allegedly running drugs for the defendant. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:51 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellants’ first alternative, which involves leaving the law as stated in OBG but without a dealing requirement, would dispense with the control mechanism which the House of Lords considered to be both necessary and desirable. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:46 pm by Shea Denning
Davis,302 N.C. 370, 275 S.E.2d 491 (1981)); Willfully neglecting and refusing to support child (State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:07 pm by Neal Davis
A human trafficking charge can involve state laws, federal laws or both. [read post]