Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 361 - 380 of 6,010
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by Stevie Phillips
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny.  [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 7:31 am
The Police Sergeant stated that the grandmother then said loudly, 'I can't, I can't, I won't. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm by Gene Quinn
On August 11, 2009, the United States District Court Judge in the Eastern District of Texas issued a final order in the matter of i4i v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The convening authority in the case of United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:13 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The en banc Eleventh Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:18 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, previewing oral argument from a case earlier this week: [T]he en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
(UC-Davis) offers his thoughts on yesterday's much-anticipated First Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court on behalf of the petitioner in Davis v. [read post]