Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 361 - 380 of 6,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am by INFORRM
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors  v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
By Judgment handed down on 29 November 2018 (R (on the Application of Jefferies and Others) v (1) Secretary of State for the Home Department (2) Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport [2018] EWHC 3239 (Admin)) Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Ouseley dismissed the Claimants claims for Judicial Review of the Government’s decision to not embark on ‘Part 2’ of the Leveson Inquiry. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 7:46 am by Stevie Phillips
By Stevie PhillipsIn a unanimous Tennessee Supreme Court opinion handed down on September 26, Chief Justice Wade outlines the historical development of state and federal sentencing guidelines.In short, he observes that the 2005 amendments to Tennessee's 1989 Sentencing Act were passed for the purpose of bringing our sentencing scheme in line with United States Supreme Court sentencing decisions, namely Apprendi and its progeny.  [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 7:31 am
The Police Sergeant stated that the grandmother then said loudly, 'I can't, I can't, I won't. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:18 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, previewing oral argument from a case earlier this week: [T]he en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
(UC-Davis) offers his thoughts on yesterday's much-anticipated First Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:00 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Supreme Court on behalf of the petitioner in Davis v. [read post]