Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 401 - 420
of 6,011
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court for that purpose (see Davis, 153 AD3d at 1632).People v Herrod, 163 A.D.3d 1462, 1462-1463. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:10 am
" When the case of Bakke v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:13 am
Wilson-Davis & Co., Inc., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:33 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Bhagwat (UC Davis)Dale Carpenter (Minnesota)James Ming Chen (Michigan State)Eric M. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Bhagwat (UC Davis)Dale Carpenter (Minnesota)James Ming Chen (Michigan State)Eric M. [read post]
27 May 2007, 12:20 pm
An arbitration agreement between the O'Melveny & Myers law firm and former employee Jacquelin Davis was unconscionable according to Davis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
Association v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:41 am
(Orin Kerr) The Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:51 am
Today in United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 3:55 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 11:15 am
However, (1) whatever Davis thinks of the federal judge’s order, she has to comply with it or risk being jailed again, though she is of course free to continue appealing it; and (2) my tentative sense — given Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:12 am
On Semiconductor v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:34 am
The Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 6:08 am
The Sixth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:34 pm
In February, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the lower court decision in Davis, et. al. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
”Looks like someone had no staying power ….# # #DECISIONDavis v Commack Hotel, LLC (AD2 Decision & Order) [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 10:03 am
In that opinion, Justice Davis stated the prior motion for reconsideration should have been denied because it added nothing new. [read post]
