Search for: "State v. Davis" Results 481 - 500 of 6,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is evident, for instance, in the fact that all the Supreme Court's sexual harassment cases have been nonpseudonymous (except Davis as next friend of LaShonda D. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:42 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
The court rejects Boule’s argument that a First Amendment retaliation claim is similar to the employment-discrimination claim the court allowed in Davis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
The theory that state legislatures are, when they regulate federal elections, immune from state constitutional limits enforceable by state courts is known generically as the “Independent State Legislature” (ISL) notion. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am by familoo
That view cannot, so it seems to me, survive the opening words of FPR 27.11, which expressly state that the right granted to journalists is to attend a hearing held in private. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am by Emma Snell
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm by Sabrina Minhas
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d at… [read post]