Search for: "State v. Delay" Results 1 - 20 of 13,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2023, 10:13 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Continue reading The post Timberlake v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 5:39 pm by Immigration Prof
The New York Times reported yesterday that delay at the Fifth Circuit in the Texas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:21 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
Absent a systemic breakdown in a state public defender system, delays caused by appointed counsel are not attributed to the state for purposes of Barker v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:46 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A delay of two years and nine months in dealing with an application for indefinite leave to remain constituted culpable and undue delay on the part of the Secretary of State for the Home Department and was productive of conspicuous unfairness in the case [...] [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 10:00 am by Comitz Stanley
As stated above, the judge in this matter harshly criticized Hartford for its delay tactics in this case; however, these long delay tactics by insurance companies’ counsel are not uncommon. [read post]
14 May 2009, 2:49 am
FH (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department “A two and three-quarter year delay by the Home Office in processing an application for indefinite leave to remain amounted to culpable and undue delay and produced conspicuous unfairness to a man who had evaded deportation in 1986 and lived under an assumed name [...] [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Kirsten Mikadze
In R v HMTQ, although the delay exceeded the 18-month ceiling set in R v Jordan, the Court found that the period between the stay of proceedings until the laying of the new charges should count towards delay. [read post]
Superior Court Justice Michaela Murphy delayed a ruling on the case just earlier this week, remanding the case until the US Supreme Court’s final decision in Trump v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:03 pm
Thus, for those waiting for the first civilian Art. 32 since Vietnam . . . you'll just have to wait another __ for United States v. [read post]