Search for: "State v. Demarest"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
Demarest v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am
Demarest, the first of which you can read here. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
At least one court, Cortes v 3A N. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
D.G. and S.H. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am
(Justice Carolyn Demarest’s opinion in Board of Managers v Chocolate Partners, LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50754(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014] and the Bankruptcy Court’s opinion in In re Die Fliedermaus LLC, 323 BR 101 [SDNY 2005], are good places to start for anyone interested in learning more on the subject.) [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
Delaware Court Looks “Beyond the Purpose Clause” Just last week, in Meyer Natural Foods LLC v Duff, C.A. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Cortes v 3A N. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:20 am
One of three, equal shareholders in a family-owned business licensed by the state liquor authority was convicted of a felony. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:08 am
Sunshine in Zito v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:28 am
Justice Demarest answered “yes” in a decision earlier this month, in Camuso v Brooklyn Portfolio LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50940(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 3:34 am
Demarest called Matter of Lowbet Realty Corp. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
Demarest v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
The court therefore acted properly in ordering him to pay the fees under an account stated theory (Shaw v. [read post]