Search for: "State v. Demarest"
Results 21 - 38
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
The case, Big Brows LLC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:20 am
One of three, equal shareholders in a family-owned business licensed by the state liquor authority was convicted of a felony. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
Cortes v 3A N. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am
At least one court, Cortes v 3A N. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
On defendants' proof of loss defense, Justice Demarest held:Although defendants' agent, Yick, provided an affidavit averring that he personally gave Shimunov a copy of a printed statement regarding the loss and requested that Shimunov complete and return the document, defendants have not demonstrated that they provided blank proof of loss forms as required under Insurance Law § 3407 [a] (Ingarra v General Accident/PG Ins. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am
Demarest, the first of which you can read here. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
Demarest v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:21 am
(Justice Carolyn Demarest’s opinion in Board of Managers v Chocolate Partners, LLC, 2014 NY Slip Op 50754(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2014] and the Bankruptcy Court’s opinion in In re Die Fliedermaus LLC, 323 BR 101 [SDNY 2005], are good places to start for anyone interested in learning more on the subject.) [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:28 am
Further, as noted in Royal Communications Consultants Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
Delaware Court Looks “Beyond the Purpose Clause” Just last week, in Meyer Natural Foods LLC v Duff, C.A. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:32 am
For instance, in Mizrahi v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
