Search for: "State v. Denny" Results 61 - 80 of 2,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 9:10 am by Ruthann Robson
Town of Oyster Bay, United States District Judge Dennis Hurley held the town's ordinance prohibiting... [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
(UC-Davis) offers his thoughts on yesterday's much-anticipated First Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Valencia v Llupar [2012] EWCA Civ 396 (30 March 2012) Al -Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 358 (29 March 2012) Cornwall Waste Forum St Dennis Branch v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 379 (29 March 2012) Berky, R (on the application of) v Newport City Council & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 378 (29 March 2012) High Court… [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:34 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Important non-patent Supreme Court case for businesses operating online: South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch LifeScan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
State and subdivisions of state are subject to ADEA regardless of its number of employees in contrast to a private sector employer where the law applies only to "an industry affecting commerce" having twenty or more employeesMount Lemmon Fire District Petitioner v John Guido, Et Al., Cite as: 586 U. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2010)(on petition en banc) by Dennis Crouch In the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in Bilski v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rev. 1149**As to state law and patents-->To support this position, the court looked to Jim Arnold Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:58 am by Dennis Crouch
This quote from the court conforms well to the Supreme Court's recent copyright decision Golan v. [read post]