Search for: "State v. Derby" Results 41 - 60 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2008, 8:48 am
  It would be the state's second execution since the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
Yesterday CAAF docketed two certified issues in an Air Force case:WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS APPLIED THE CORRECT STANDARD OF REVIEW WHEN DETERMINING WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED THE DEFENSE MOTION FOR A SANITY BOARD.WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED BY FINDING THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE DENIED APPELLANT'S REQUEST FOR A SANITY BOARD FINDING HE HAD NOT MET HIS BURDEN OF FACTUAL PERSUASION TO JUSTIFY… [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The plaintiff claims that three police officers in Derby, Connecticut used excessive force while effectuating her arrest. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:22 pm by J
In cases where an expert witness, who has prepared a report, could not assert that the report contained the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth without some qualification, that qualification should be stated in the report (Derby & Co. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm
Later, if there’s any question, I can go back and see what I did on a certain day.Favorite Internet Resource: Has to be Google.com or Accurint.com (http://www.accurint.com/).Favorite Legal Software: Our firm recently switched case management software from Amicus V to Practice Master by STI (http://www.tabs3.com/). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:51 pm by James McComish
  Her Honour quoted Derby & Co Ltd v Weldon [1990] 1 Ch 65 at 81 (CA), where Lord Donaldson of Lymington MR referred to the possibility of barring the right to defend of a defendant with no assets within the jurisdiction who breaches a Mareva injunction freezing those assets. [read post]