Search for: "State v. Dietz"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm
The majority relied heavily on State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 6:42 am
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued an opinion in Liese v. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
True threats are those that “by their utterance alone, inflict injury or tend naturally to evoke immediate violence” (People v Golb, 23 NY3d 455, 467 [2014], quoting Dietze, 75 NY2d at 52). [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 5:58 pm
True threats are those that “by their utterance alone, inflict injury or tend naturally to evoke immediate violence” (People v Golb, 23 NY3d 455, 467 [2014], quoting Dietze, 75 NY2d at 52). [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
From State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:29 am
In People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 4:29 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
Case No. 09 -60723, Motion for Judicial Inquiry Garfinkel v Mager, Kunkel & Dietz, Orange County Case No. 09-040477 - Ver. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:13 am
In Ping v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
It was wham, bam, thank you Supreme Court of the United States for American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
Just Film, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 2:23 pm
See State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:18 am
Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 51 (1989). [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Dietz v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:18 am
Dietz & Watson, Inc., the Federal Circuit noted that “common sense” has its boundaries. [read post]
