Search for: "State v. Dillard" Results 21 - 40 of 90
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2014, 2:05 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v JR (Jamaica), R (on the application of) [2014] EWCA Civ 477 (16 April 2014) Dowling & Ors v Bennett Griffin [2014] EWCA Civ 473 (16 April 2014) Pitalia & Anor v The National Health Service Commissioning Board [2014] EWCA Civ 474 (16 April 2014) DB Group Services (UK) Ltd v Revenue And Customs [2014] EWCA Civ 452 (16 April 2014) Figurasin & Anor v Central… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:25 am by David DePaolo
Dillard's that the state's opt-out program failed constitutional muster because it subjects workers to differential treatment depending on whether their employers are subject to the Oklahoma Employee Injury Benefit Act or the Administrative Workers' Compensation Act.Yesterday the state's Supreme Court issued a 50 page ruling striking a provision of the 2013 reform that bars cumulative injury claims filed within the first 180 days of employment.The Court… [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:12 am by sally
Supreme Court A v British Broadcasting Corporation (Scotland) [2014] UKSC 25 (08 May 2014) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) R (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 597 (08 May 2014) High Court (Administrative Court) Privacy International, R (On the Application Of) v The Commissioner for HM Revenue & Customs [2014] EWHC 1475 (Admin) (12 May 2014) Stone & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities And Local Government & Anor [2014] EWHC 1456 (Admin) (12 May 2014) … [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Last week, Judge Stephen Dillard, chief judge of the Georgia Court of Appeals (and, back in the day, blogger Feddie at Southern Appeal), wrote an interesting concurring opinion (Borgers v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
Amy Dillard discusses Hall v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Other courts in other States seen to equate no-hire clauses with more restrictive covenants.The case is CMGRP, Inc. v. [read post]