Search for: "State v. District Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 72,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 8:18 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:00 am
Rhodes v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 3:16 pm
District Court for the Western District of Kentucky in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 5:14 am
Mount Gay: In a blind taste test the District of New Jersey decided they didn’t even like rum and sent the case back to state court. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:10 am
Here is the abstract: On June 26, 2008, the United States Supreme Court handed down its 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
Concepcion v. United States Affirms District Court’s Broad Discretion in Deciding Criminal Sentences
30 Jun 2022, 6:24 am
In Concepcion v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
See State v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:24 am
” The Court affirmed the district court’s loss amount, holding… The post United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
The lower court proceedings are now underway in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 6:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:02 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:06 am
District Court in a legal malpractice suit. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 5:09 pm
United States Senior District Court Judge Lawrence K. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:15 pm
I have a guest post this morning over at Record on Appeal about State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 4:36 am
District Judge Andrew... [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
A federal district court in Illinois disagreed, finding that the trooper could no longer perform the essential functions of her […] The post District Court Rules that Diabetic Illinois State Trooper No Longer Able to Perform “Essential Functions of the Job” appeared first on National Police and Fire Labor Blog. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:51 pm
United States, No. 17-10620 (September 25, 2018) The Court affirmed the district court’s denial of the defendant’s § 2255 motion, holding that the defendant’s Johnson claim was not a “new rule of constitutional law that was previously unavailable” since the defendant included a Johnson claim in his first § 2255, which were… The post Robert Randolph v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 3:00 am
–JR The post District Court Holds Home State Exception Requires Evidence and Allows Discovery appeared first on CAFA Law Blog. [read post]
