Search for: "State v. District Court" Results 21 - 40 of 71,641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2025, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
We’ll get another take on that topic when the Supreme Court issues its opinion(s) in FSC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am by Staff Attorney
Donald Anthony Wright, et al., Civil Action Number 2:24-CV-00065, in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 5:26 am by Eugene Volokh
But many states don't have such a rule, and indeed expressly provide for courts to give advisory opinions in certain cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:56 am by Weronika Galka
Melanie Zanona, Frank Thorp V, and Garrett Haake report for NBC News. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Suit was filed this week in a Delaware federal district court challenging a new Delaware law that requires pro-life pregnancy centers to include in all advertising and to disseminate to clients onsite a disclaimer stating:  "This facility is not licensed as a medical facility by the state of Delaware and has no licensed medical provider who provides or directly supervises the provision of services. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 4:06 am by Barry Sookman
In an important copyright decision released earlier this week, Circuit Judge Bibas (sitting by designation) in a United States District Court granted Thomson Reuters summary judgement victories by finding that its Westlaw headnotes and key number system were protected by copyright and that the uses of the headnotes to train a competitive legal research tool was not a fair use. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm by Gina Gkoulgkountina
District Court for the Southern District of New York, however, granted a temporary restraining order blocking access to U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:26 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in September 2024 that the plaintiffs established by a preponderance of the evidence that the levels of fluoride typical in drinking water in the United States pose an unreasonable risk of injury to the health of the public. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 4:26 pm by Lynn L. Bergeson
District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in September 2024 that the plaintiffs established by a preponderance of the evidence that the levels of fluoride typical in drinking water in the United States pose an unreasonable risk of injury to the health of the public. [read post]