Search for: "State v. District Court" Results 81 - 100 of 80,465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Leland Garvin
The trial court denied the request, as did Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal upon review. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am by Leland Garvin
The trial court denied the request, as did Florida’s Second District Court of Appeal upon review. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Linda Panszczyk
As for the injunction, the Fifth Circuit agreed with Rolex that the district court should have enjoined the sale of Rolex watches with non-genuine bezels, thus affirming, as modified, the district court’s injunction in part (Rolex Watch USA, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:15 am by Meredith Ervine
Our readers know that Delaware forum selection clauses have been enforced by courts in many states since Delaware Chancery’s 2013 decision in Boilermakers v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Meredith R. Miller and Laura Dooley
  And even when juries are empaneled and empowered in federal courts, the jury pool from which they are drawn is the federal district (rather than a county as in state court), which can result in profound demographic differences in the makeup of the jury. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 12:53 pm by Steven Cohen
General Motors, LLC – United States District Court – Middle District of Florida – January 29th, 2024) involves a claim of product liability and negligence of defective design. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 8:44 am by Eric Goldman
Since we affirm the district court’s rulings on the state law claims, we need not resolve the federal law cross appeal. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff was expelled and now sues SJU for sex discrimination.While this case arrives at the Court of Appeals in a Rule 12 posture, which provides a low pleading standard for plaintiffs seeking to avoid dismissal, the Second Circuit (Sack and Parker) agrees with the district court that plaintiff does not plead a prima facie case of discrimination. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am by Will Baude
Anderson litigation, both the Colorado District and the Colorado Supreme Court found Section Three to be justiciable and Trump has not pressed a political question argument in his Supreme Court merits briefs. [read post]