Search for: "State v. District Court in and for Delaware County" Results 181 - 200 of 417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
As also already reported in The Legal Intelligencer in a July 9, 2015 article by Gina Passarella, in a recent July 8, 2015 detailed Order, the Eastern Federal District Court of Pennsylvania remanded a removed Post-Koken case back to Delaware County in the matter of Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Cornwall Council) v Secretary of State for Health; R (Cornwall Council) v Somerset County Council, heard 18-19 March 2015. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
"Judge Pappert, Serving on the United States District Court forthe Eastern District of PennsylvaniaIn this matter, Dr. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
Last year, the Delaware Supreme Court had to order a new trial for R. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:18 am by Nassiri Law
On appeal, it was noted several other district courts in the Third Circuit (which covers Delaware, New Jersey and parts of Pennsylvania) had sided with employers in similar disputes. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ebersole v Delaware County Board of Elections, 20 N.E. 3d 678 (OH 9/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-ohio-4077.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Referenda [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ebersole v Delaware County Board of Elections, 20 N.E. 3d 678 (OH 9/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-ohio-4077.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Referenda [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
   Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption… [read post]