Search for: "State v. District Court in and for Delaware County" Results 201 - 220 of 428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
"Judge Pappert, Serving on the United States District Court forthe Eastern District of PennsylvaniaIn this matter, Dr. [read post]
20 May 2015, 2:01 pm by Schachtman
Last year, the Delaware Supreme Court had to order a new trial for R. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
Meanwhile, County of Maricopa, Arizona v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 6:18 am by Nassiri Law
On appeal, it was noted several other district courts in the Third Circuit (which covers Delaware, New Jersey and parts of Pennsylvania) had sided with employers in similar disputes. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ebersole v Delaware County Board of Elections, 20 N.E. 3d 678 (OH 9/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-ohio-4077.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Referenda [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 9:10 pm by Patricia Salkin
Ebersole v Delaware County Board of Elections, 20 N.E. 3d 678 (OH 9/19/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.sconet.state.oh.us/rod/docs/pdf/0/2014/2014-ohio-4077.pdf Filed under: Current Caselaw, Referenda [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
   Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Rather, the Third Circuit Court stated that there is no bright line rule permitting the district courts to automatically abstain from hearing such cases unless there was a total absence of any federal legal question presented. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption… [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Legislature Tables Measure to Address Fee-Shifting ByLaws: The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]