Search for: "State v. District Court in and for Delaware County" Results 261 - 280 of 419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Koninklijke Philips Electronics Docket: 09-389 Issue: Whether a party contesting the jurisdiction of the district court must first move to vacate or set aside a default judgment pursuant to either Rule 55(c) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the District Court as a prerequisite to appealing the default judgment. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm by Law Lady
Robinson of the District of Delaware issued the enhanced damages order March 13, saying the doubling of the jury's $19.5 million award was "reasonable under the circumstances. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lambert, No. 05-99011Denial of habeas relief from a conviction and death sentence for the first-degree murders of petitioner's wife and business partner is affirmed as: 1) a state court's holding that the trial court did not violate Faretta v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 8:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Senator from Delaware from 1973 to 2009, Gerald is planning to refile his federal lawsuit in Manhattan, New York district court sometime in 2017. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Three additional statesDelaware, Rhode Island and Minnesota—have legalized same-sex marriage in just the past month, bringing the total to twelve states plus the District of Columbia.) [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Cox, No. 07-1103 In an action alleging vindictive prosecution against Michigan's Attorney General, a state Supreme Court Justice, and the state's Secretary of State, as well as others in the AG's office, dismissal of plaintiffs' claims and imposition of sanctions against them are affirmed where: 1) because the issues raised in a state court were substantially the same as those raised in the district court,… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3)… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Next, we headed to the East Coast and defeated a preliminary injunction in the Delaware Court of Chancery, following a failed business acquisition. [read post]