Search for: "State v. District Court in and for Delaware County"
Results 341 - 360
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
Last year also saw Delaware decisions that continue to change the landscape of M&A litigation and interesting developments in the area of SEC enforcement. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v… [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
Bracci, the court affirmed an order of Delaware County Family Court Judge Carl F. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
DiStefano of Philly.com reported that the University of Pennsylvania filed suit in federal district court to protect its well-known federally-registered rights in the WHARTON name and mark. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
In Weingarten v Kopelowitz, 2020 NY Slip Op 51260(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2020], the plaintiff brought suit individually and derivatively on behalf of a Delaware LLC in which he held a one-third membership agreement after he was terminated as property manager of multi-unit rental properties in Tennessee owned indirectly by the LLC. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
Central sales tax collection has historically been the norm for those states with centralized collection, but Arizona followed suit more recently when it consolidated its collection authority in 2017.[4] In some states, only select jurisdictions may impose a sales tax, while in others, a broad range of jurisdictions—counties, municipalities, and various local authorities—may opt, either by ordinance or local referendum, to impose one. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
In early January 2012, Shure brought a non-payment summary eviction proceeding in Nassau County District Court on the trust's behalf against the LLC. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:00 am
In early January 2012, Shure brought a non-payment summary eviction proceeding in Nassau County District Court on the trust's behalf against the LLC. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am
But I meant the state courts.) [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm
The district court disagreed, holding that they were not privileged, but the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
OttDocket: 10-490Issue(s): (1) Whether the Court should overrule the remaining part of Booth v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:08 pm
The dust-up in Delaware over fee-shifting bylaws got started in May 2014, when the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Aug. 24, 2010), the court reversed a district court prediction that Delaware would adopt a medical monitoring cause of action. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
Supreme Court's Lewis v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm
Weekly D805bInsurance -- Uninsured motorist -- Stacking -- Where insurer issued policy to Florida residents covering vehicles registered and principally garaged in Florida and also issued and delivered to insureds in Florida a policy covering vehicle which was registered and principally garaged in Delaware, an anti-stacking provision in the Delaware policy is unenforceable under Florida law where the insurer did not obtain the insureds' informed consent to the… [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:25 am
Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware (Wilmington). [read post]
