Search for: "State v. Dodd" Results 1 - 20 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 11:13 am by Brian Wolfman
Dodd-Frank also limits the ability of banks and others to ignore state consumer protection laws through the doctrine of preemption: Subsidiaries of national banks and federal thrifts are no longer entitled to preemption (reversing the Watters v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin The Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing yesterday entitled “The Administrative State v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:27 am by Lawrence Solum
This conventional wisdom springs from a long-standing legal tradition, originating with McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 12:49 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Somers, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided that employees who raise internal complaints about possible violation of securities laws are not protected as whistleblowers under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case examines the territorial reach of that statute.The case is Meng-Lin v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:31 am
Dodd (Suffolk University Law School) has posted The 2007 Roberts Court Education Law Cases: Reaffirmation or Cut-Back of Student Rights? [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:21 am by Deepak Gupta
They aren't so much attacks on the CFPB and Dodd-Frank as attacks on the modern administrative state itself. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 12:39 pm by Deepak Gupta
For example, the regulatory reform law essentially reversed the Supreme Court case Watters v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
That’s the message the United States Supreme Court sent to whistleblowers with its decision yesterday in Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:35 pm by Adam Levitin
Even longer version:  the plaintiffs in State National Bank of Big Spring v. [read post]