Search for: "State v. Dodd"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2024, 5:29 am
For example, in SEC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
In Texas Bankers Association v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
Corner Post v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Today, Columbia is honoring Jack Coffee, a leader of securities law scholarship and policy. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am
See, e.g., Memorandum of Law in Support of Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, SEC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
The decision in Murray v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm
ShareThe argument Tuesday in Cantero v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:37 pm
Tuesday’s Cantero v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 8:11 am
For example, in the 2004 case of SEC v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
FSOC stated that in addition to being inconsistent with the statutory standard set forth in Section 113 of the Dodd-Frank Act, FSOC making this assessment “could trigger a run on the company. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
”[19]The Interpretive Guidance states that the Council expects to “continue addressing most risks through its collaboration with primary financial regulators” and will base any nonbank financial company designation on “data-driven analysis that reflects the distinctive aspects of the company, its market, and its existing regulation. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The proposed changes to Regulation II under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act would also change the amounts that bank card issuers subject to the rule can charge to cover fraud costs and to counter fraud losses. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Kivett, and the New York state law in Cantero v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
On October 3, the second morning of its new term, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in the case of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
The Office emphasized that this change is needed in light of the landmark Obergefell v. [read post]
