Search for: "State v. Donato" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Meanwhile, Google has filed its opposition brief, which just like in the Northern District of California is the epitome of denial:United States of America, et al., v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am by Florian Mueller
" Google opposes any trial date earlier than November 6 because of a potential conflict with the trial in the first United States et al. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Concerning the Doctrine of Primary JurisdictionDonato v Plainview-Old Bethpage CSD, 286 AD2d 388 The Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction was the underpinning of a decision by a State Supreme Court justice in the Donato case -- a case involving an educator's claim that she was eligible for reinstatement from a preferred list. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am by Florian Mueller
By coincidence, that was the day the United States Department of Justice and eight state AGs filed a second Unite States et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had entered the following order on Tuesday (November 15):"The request by plaintiffs Epic and Match to file amended complaints, [...], is granted. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:35 am by David Lat
[ATL Redline] * As I predicted, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]