Search for: "State v. Downey" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm by Matthew Reisig
Yes, if it causes “a stinging sensation” which was set forth in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm by Sara Alexandre
” Vanity responded to the letter by filing for declaratory relief against the denim giant stating that the “V” design on the back of its jeans is “visually distinctive” from Levi’s jeans and that “Levi Strauss does not have the right to prevent Vanity from using a stylized version of the letter ‘V’ in connection with its pocket designs. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
North Carolina’s Application of U.S. v Rodriguez Case #1 State v Bedient Read More Case #4 State v Johnson Read More Case #2 State v Castillo Read More Case #5 State v Downey Read More … [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:04 pm
To us, the decision seemed contrary to the rule stated in Branick. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As an initial matter, this motion is premature, as it was filed “prior to the preliminary conference or the opportunity of the parties to conduct discovery” (Downey v Local 46 2nd Holding Co., 34 AD3d 318 [1st Dept 2006] citing Bradley v Ibex Constr. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:28 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Mississippi Asks Supreme Court to End Roe v. [read post]