Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 201 - 220 of 36,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2024, 5:59 am by Joshua Andresen
In the United States, we should be concerned with how a second Trump administration might seek to abuse existing laws and regulations—and new ones—to shut down political discourse and debate in this country. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm by Amy Howe
Virginia, the Supreme Court’s 1967 case striking down Virginia’s ban on interracial marriage. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” This is a critically important set of observations, because it helps turn upside down the longstanding effort by to trivialize privacy injuries as speculative. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 7:54 am by Tobin Admin
I was off balance because of the way that the truck turned and my body weight was pushing down like I was standing on one foot. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am by Elizabeth Goitein
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
This law was part of an omnibus bill dealing with the State Department. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 1:37 am by INFORRM
On 25 November 2024, the Supreme Court of Western Australia handed down judgement in favour of the plaintiffs in the case of McIntosh v Peterson [No2] [2024] WASC 428. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Sixth, Trump's pardon of Arpaio concerned his conviction, and "any other offenses under Chapter 21 of Title 18, United States Code that might arise, or be charged, in connection with Melendres v. [read post]