Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 321 - 340
of 36,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Many of these cases involved the Court’s striking down restrictions placed on the President’s authority to discharge officials exercising executive power,[14] but one of the clearest and most important of these cases is Zivotofsky v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:24 am
Supreme Court has handed down a decision in EMD Sales Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 5:22 am
Slabakis v Olympos Trading Corp. (84 Misc 3d 1231 (A) [Sup Ct, NY County Nov. 20, 2024]), involved alleged breach of a “buyout agreement” between three owners of several corporations in the Manhattan commercial real estate business. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:13 am
On Saturday 18 January 2025, TikTok stopped working in the US, in advance of a federal law coming into force, which required TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to sell it to a non-Chinese owner or be completely shut down. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 1:59 am
It says a great deal about the state of modern journalism and its unrelenting efforts at self-destruction. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:06 pm
In the 2024 case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
19 Jan 2025, 9:40 am
D’Aubigny v Khan & Anor (2025) EWCA Civ 11 (Not on Bailii yet, a copy of the judgment is here.) [read post]
18 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
What is somewhat intriguing is the rapidity with which this convention of presidential restraint broke down. [read post]
18 Jan 2025, 3:37 am
Other areas of the facility were similarly found to be infested with pests, including “ants traveling down the wall,” and sightings of a beetle and a cockroach. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:37 pm
The Supreme Court unanimously upheld a federal law requiring TikTok’s Chinese owners to sell or shut down the social-media app by Jan. 19, siding with Congress’s national-security concerns over the platform and its users’ claim that the ban violates the First Amendment. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 12:11 pm
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 9:04 am
The letter - published here - follows the Court of First Instance's decision in Microsoft Corp v Suinno Mobile where the Court stated that a UPC Representative could not be independent if they are "employed or financially dependent on their client or who ha[ve], within the represented body, extensive administrative and financial powers" (paragraph 36, Order 41174/2024). [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:19 am
TikTok Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:17 am
United States, 250 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:48 am
The plaintiffs in this lawsuit, Amal Gaza, et al v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
Equity is a centuries-old legal concept that boils down to fairness and justice. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
" The porn industry echoed Kennedy in 2004 on filters, but based on the oral argument yesterday in Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 4:30 am
Suspect Anonymity On 31 May 2024, Humphreys J struck down legislation granting “blanket” anonymity to those suspected of sexual offences. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 4:05 am
On January 13, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments (video of full oral arguments) in Paxton v. [read post]
