Search for: "State v. Downs" Results 101 - 120 of 36,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2025, 2:59 pm by Kevin
PLEASE NOTE that I am still waiting for someone to send me a picture of the attorney who wore a Grover head during opening statements in Burns v. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 12:35 pm by John Ross
Eleventh Circuit: Which isn't sex discrimination given the non-sex-based reasons for the difference: He had more relevant experience (13 years v. 2 years) and more education (a PhD v. a master's degree). [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 11:54 am by Mark D. Rasch
The Sixth Circuit’s January 2, 2025, decision in Ohio Telecom Association et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
It is unabashedly helping to move the United States down the road to authoritarianism. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:35 am by Jocelyn Bosse
[Merpel: This is not his first rodeo: Wright was previously held in contempt during legal proceedings in Australia and the United States]. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 7:02 am by Molly Buckley
The Supreme Court has set this case, Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 11:52 am
(Ken Watkin, 'State Practice in Assassination: What is Old is New Again,' Lieber Institute (10 October 2024)).Iran unleashed a major airstrike targeting sites across Israel on Tuesday night, while Israel's air defenses shot down most of the 180 incoming missiles, according to Israeli officials. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am by Giles Peaker
If your name’s not down… 159-167 Prince of Wales Road RTM Company Ltd v Assethold Ltd (2024) EWCA Civ 1544 A short but unusual point on right to manage applications arose in this second appeal. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 5:00 am
Notable Decisions on Certificates of Merit in Med Mal CasesThere were a couple of decisions of note that came down over the past year regarding Certificates of Merit that are required in medical malpractice cases in Pennsylvania.In the case of Rightmyer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm by The Regulatory Review
Pierce, Jr., The George Washington University Law School United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 10:03 pm by Josh Blackman
United States, 411 U.S. 526, 541, 93 S.Ct. 1702, 1711, 36 L.Ed.2d 472 (1973); Fortson v. [read post]