Search for: "State v. Driscoll"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:30 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 9:26 pm
Congratulations are in order for Licensed Physician's Assistant Saloumeh Rahbarvafaei and her defense attorneys, Federal Public Defenders Erin Murphy and Michael Driscoll, Jr. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
Driscoll (1st Cir. 2010) (Souter, J.) [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 7:19 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:01 am
Likewise with Muir v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
12 May 2021, 3:11 am
Here, in Melendez v Renfroe, Driscoll & Foster, LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 31462(U) April 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157344/2019 Judge: W. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 7:21 pm
Written by Marcus Teo (Sheridan Fellow (Incoming), National University of Singapore) Since Foster v Driscoll [1929] 1 KB 470, common law courts have recognised that contracts made with the intention to commit a criminal offence in a foreign state are unenforceable, even if the contract contemplated an alternative mode or place of performance. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:00 pm
Recently, in Soundview Cinemas v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:26 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:34 am
Melendez v Renfroe, Driscoll & Foster, LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 32600(U) August 11, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157344/2019 Judge: W. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
” Various commentators continue to reflect on the court’s approach to the separation of church and state. [read post]
