Search for: "State v. Dubay"
Results 41 - 60
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Interestingly, the plaintiff, Dr Seuss, had previously been involved, several few years ago, in a leading case on fair use, Dr Seuss Enterprises v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 11:49 am
In Dubai. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Greatship (India) Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND to the district court. 07a0442p.06 Dubay v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 4:44 pm
Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition for extraordinary relief to prohibit the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals from ordering a DuBay hearing is granted. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
The dissenting opinion states, "Instead, the CCAs will have to resort to the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
See United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:28 pm
Evidence in US v. [read post]
