Search for: "State v. Dubay" Results 41 - 60 of 186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 7:04 pm
DuBay, 17 C.M.A. 147, 37 C.M.R. 411 (1967). [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Interestingly, the plaintiff, Dr Seuss, had previously been involved, several few years ago, in a leading case on fair use, Dr Seuss Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 5:26 am
Full story: Family Law Week.CASESFather v Mother [2020] EWHC 1929 (Fam) (03 July 2020)Father's application, initially for summary return of children to Dubai, and then for direct contact with children, in which the main issue was the degree of risk that the Father would retain them in Dubai if allowed to take them outside England. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
We AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND to the district court. 07a0442p.06 Dubay v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 4:44 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Accordingly, it is ordered that the petition for extraordinary relief to prohibit the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals from ordering a DuBay hearing is granted. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
The dissenting opinion states, "Instead, the CCAs will have to resort to the procedures invented by United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 8:16 am
For examples, they point to the investment activities of Dubai Ports World and the China National Offshore Oil Company. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am by Latham & Watkins LLP
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]