Search for: "State v. Dunns" Results 1 - 20 of 1,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 1:35 am
Dunn v Parole Board [2008] EWCA Civ 374; [2008] WLR (D) 110 “In the context of CPR Pt 11, the limitation provisions within s 7(5) of the Human Rights Act 1998 provided a defence to a claim rather than going to jurisdiction, so that a failure to apply to strike out within 14 days of acknowledging service did not preclude a defendant from applying to strike out a claim on the basis of limitation. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:48 am by emagraken
Dunn states that if you intend to contradict an opposing witness on a significant matter you must put the contradictory version of events to the witness on cross examination. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by The Federalist Society
Dunn involved the scope of a state’s duty, identified by the Supreme Court in its 1985 decision in Ake v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:44 am
When you're litigating against the United States, there are lots and lots of ways to lose. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
To the extent that the state court based its conclusion on the IQ score of 75, the Court cited Hall v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:16 pm by WIMS
It took a lot of maneuvering between the State of Texas and the United States to create the national park out of these coastal island lands, much belonging to the State of Texas, some belonging to private parties. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
In 1948, the Supreme Court outlawed these practices in the seminal case, Shelly v. [read post]