Search for: "State v. Durham" Results 221 - 240 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 12:35 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
The purpose of the First Amendment, Wu writes, is “to protect actual humans against the evil of state censorship.” [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm by Bruce Boyden
The purpose of the First Amendment, Wu writes, is “to protect actual humans against the evil of state censorship.” [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Gina Durham
The review should not be completed in an IP vacuum, Gina Durham, DLA Piper, Chicago, told BNA. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Durham, N.C. : Carolina Academic Press, 2012 xvii, 429 p. ; 26 cm. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
    So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future?  [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:06 am by New Books Script
51 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 28 from 2012: HJ 5316 E58 2011 Environmental taxation and climate change : achieving environmental sustainability through fiscal policy edited by Larry Kreiser, Julsuchada Sirisom, Hope Ashiabor, Janet E. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:19 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix Chambers.
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm by KC Johnson
Hobgood noted that the Supreme Court decisions cited by Cline’s attorneys regarding the First Amendment protections for public officials explicitly carved out an exception: that, as Garrison v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
 The trial court initially stated that this latter question was outside of its jurisdiction but seems to have reversed course. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:44 am by KC Johnson
Cline attorney Patrick Mincey even cited Marbury v. [read post]