Search for: "State v. Durling" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 7:54 pm
Durling and the BIA for applying the wrong standard for CAT relief under the Convention Against Torture as set forth in Silva-Rengifo v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm by Dennis Crouch
In one of them, LKQ asked the court to rule that the current primary reference requirement for design patent obviousness, as stated in In re Rosen and Durling v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
The Federal Circuit is hearing oral arguments today in the design patent case of  LKQ Corporation v. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:07 am by Holly
  In May, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) redefined the test for nonobviousness [LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:00 am by Audrey A Millemann
The appellate court stated that it had no authority to overrule Durling or Rosen, that KSR did not address design patents at all, and that the Federal Circuit had decided over 50 appeals since KSR, relying on Durling and Rosen. [read post]
24 May 2024, 12:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch On May 22, 2024, the day after the Federal Circuit’s en banc LKQ v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm by Brett Trout
 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC that the Rosen-Durling test is out and the tried and true Graham v. [read post]