Search for: "State v. Eager " Results 21 - 40 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2024, 4:41 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Nebraska Republicans are eager to avoid a repeat especially given that the 2024 election could come down to a single electoral vote.If enacted, this law should face constitutional questions under Trump v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:07 pm by Kyle Graham
A little while back, I was considering whether to undertake an empirical study into whether law enforcement officers were relying on the inventory-search exception to the warrant requirement more often after the United States Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We have written that sometimes Courts are too eager to dismiss a legal malpractice case in CPLR 3211 grounds. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:58 pm
  Today, in a particularly interesting context, the issues was before the Supreme Court in the case of Danforth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 6:37 pm
  Obviously, I'm eager to discuss the case right away but will do my best to avoid stepping on the substantive discussion that we'll be having in these pages presently. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 5:15 am by Joe Patrice
A lot of people aren't familiar with State of Oregon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That extension — considerably less than the added thirty days the states had sought — makes it more likely that the case, United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
  And, ever eager to help out the Justices, I have been a part of a team that yesterday filed a petition in US v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 7:37 pm
Perhaps we’re all eager to get home early and shovel our driveways? [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:12 am by David Oscar Markus
But I doubt that the proud men who wrote the charter of ourliberties would have been so eager to open their mouths for royal inspection. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Teesta Atul Setalvad v State of Gujarat may well be a test case to decide whether the State's eagerness for custodial interrogation of an accused has to be given primacy over the accused's civil liberties. [read post]