Search for: "State v. Eisenstein" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
LA Akin Gump associate Scott Street analyzes Monday’s decision in Eisenstein. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari in the case of Eisenstein v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
 They will also know that judges tend to take an ever-so-slightly dimmer view of experts who seem to be obstructive and/or who seem to be peddling a case on behalf of the party instructing them – see for example Pumfrey J (as he then was) commenting on Professor Eisenstein in RIM v Inpro. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“While the precise date of the alleged malpractice is not clear, even giving plaintiff the benefit of the continuous representation (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164 [2001]) and the continuing wrong doctrine (see Harvey v Metropolitan Life Ins. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Eisenstein v. [read post]