Search for: "State v. Eisenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
LA Akin Gump associate Scott Street analyzes Monday’s decision in Eisenstein. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari in the case of Eisenstein v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:32 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:18 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
Irwin Eisenstein, Petitioner, v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:11 am
The case, Heiligmann v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:34 pm
In Eisenstein v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 3:34 pm
In Eisenstein v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Schwab v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Profeta & Eisenstein (Herbst Law PLLC, New York, NY [Robert L. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Profeta & Eisenstein (Herbst Law PLLC, New York, NY [Robert L. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
They will also know that judges tend to take an ever-so-slightly dimmer view of experts who seem to be obstructive and/or who seem to be peddling a case on behalf of the party instructing them – see for example Pumfrey J (as he then was) commenting on Professor Eisenstein in RIM v Inpro. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:42 am
“While the precise date of the alleged malpractice is not clear, even giving plaintiff the benefit of the continuous representation (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164 [2001]) and the continuing wrong doctrine (see Harvey v Metropolitan Life Ins. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:08 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:41 am
However, tolling resulting from continuous representation ends “once the client is informed or otherwise put on notice of the attorney’s withdrawal from representation” (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 170-171 [2001]; accord RJR Mech. [read post]