Search for: "State v. Eisenstein" Results 21 - 40 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Redding (08-479) — constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs Eisenstein v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They also wanted Fischbarg to apply for sale-of-liquor licenses from the New York State Liquor Authority (“the SLA”). [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Accrual is measured from the commission of the alleged malpractice, when all facts necessary to the cause of action have occurred and the aggrieved party can obtain relief in court, regardless of when the operative facts are discovered by the plaintiff” (Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 164 [citations omitted]; see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166). [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Redding (08-479), on the constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs At 11 a.m. in Eisenstein v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action for fraud, as they never alleged that they paid the allegedly fraudulent bills and suffered injury as a result (see Small v Lorillard Tobacco Co., 94 NY2d 43, 57 [1999]). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Pursuant to CPLR 214(6), an action for legal malpractice must be commenced within three years from the date of accrual (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166 [2001]). [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
State, 701 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1997) and Buenoano v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:36 pm by Amy Howe
However, the bench that heard today’s oral argument in Howell v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 . generally limited to the course of representation concerning a specific legal matter,” not merely a continuing relation between the attorney and client (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001]). [read post]