Search for: "State v. Eisenstein"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
"Assuming that the legal malpractice causes of action accrued more than three years before this action was commenced (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 543; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872, 872; Alicanti v Bianco, 2 AD3d 373, 374), nevertheless, the complaint adequately alleged that the plaintiff was "left with the reasonable impression that [Levinson] was, in fact, actively addressing [his] legal… [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 7:01 am
Mark Dershwitz University of Massachusetts Medical School Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology 364 Plantation Street Worcester, MA 01605 Hyman Eisenstein, Ph.D., A.B.P.N. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Under the continuous representation doctrine, the statute of limitations for legal malpractice is tolled “only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim” (McCoy, 99 NY2d at 306; Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168 [2001]). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:00 am
Eisenstein, 635 A.2d 1327 (Md. 1994). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:05 pm
- Matt Eisenstein and Rob Katerberg [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:42 am
Herms stated herself and her infant were Business Select passengers, but her 4 year old was not. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Arguing for the state in Ohio v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 168 (2001). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman LLP, 110 AD3d 426), rather than granting dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:07 am
The prosecution is being handled by Assistant United States Attorneys Ilana Eisenstein and Jamie McCall, District of Delaware. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:10 pm
Ceglia v Facebook - Answer and Affirmative Defenses | Paul Ceglia v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001). [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:28 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:26 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy asked questions harking back to his due process concurrence in Albright v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001) (citing Glamm v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:33 pm
United States in 2016. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001) (citing Glamm v. [read post]
