Search for: "State v. Eisenstein"
Results 41 - 60
of 68
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001) (citing Glamm v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
"Assuming that the legal malpractice causes of action accrued more than three years before this action was commenced (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 543; Melendez v Bernstein, 29 AD3d 872, 872; Alicanti v Bianco, 2 AD3d 373, 374), nevertheless, the complaint adequately alleged that the plaintiff was "left with the reasonable impression that [Levinson] was, in fact, actively addressing [his] legal… [read post]
4 May 2010, 3:59 am
" McCoy v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 166, 750 N.E.2d 67, 726 N.Y.S.2d 365 (2001). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 11:29 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 2:11 am
The case, Heiligmann v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 7:20 am
LA Akin Gump associate Scott Street analyzes Monday’s decision in Eisenstein. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:18 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
Irwin Eisenstein, Petitioner, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 7:09 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 12:48 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:53 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
At 11 a.m., the Court will hear argument in Eisenstein v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:32 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Redding (08-479), on the constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs At 11 a.m. in Eisenstein v. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Redding (08-479) — constitutionality of strip-searching a student at a public school in search of drugs Eisenstein v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:04 am
Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari in the case of Eisenstein v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:11 am
Eisenstein v. [read post]
